deeplydippy
TO PROTECT AND TO SWERVE ?
2
664
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TO PROTECT AND TO SWERVE ?
<!--quoteo(post=7613:date=Mon 12th Jun 2006, 09:26 PM:name=deeplydippy)-->QUOTE(deeplydippy @ Mon 12th Jun 2006, 09:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->[Image: dry.gif] [Image: dry.gif] [Image: dry.gif] [Image: dry.gif]
Does 200 pounds even cover the cost of replacing the two signs?

[Image: ranting.gif] [Image: ranting.gif] [Image: ranting.gif] [Image: ranting.gif]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Fines are punishment, not to pay for the damage caused. This is either paid for by court-awarded damages against the guilty party or (I suspect in this case) by Lancs Police Insurance Policy.


Messages In This Thread
TO PROTECT AND TO SWERVE ? - by deeplydippy - 12-06-2006, 08:41 PM
TO PROTECT AND TO SWERVE ? - by Andy R - 13-06-2006, 07:48 AM
TO PROTECT AND TO SWERVE ? - by Guest - 13-06-2006, 03:47 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: