Sucker

[dablik]

With the power of social media now it could be worth plastering the problem and treatment you've got from dealers on as many platforms as you can. Even bike mags would be interested and once it gets the attention of the right people at Royal Enfield, it might just work. Might. Emails to Royal Enfields customer services, publicity dept etc might just annoy them enough to try and hush hush the whole saga. That's how BMW and Ducati deal with known faults and it keeps the bike selling.

 

Your right Mark, but it's not a road i can be arsed going down at all, the bike is a year old now so what they are inferring but not saying is "user interferance" if it was up to 6 months old i reckon it would of been sorted, i could of course use my consumer legal rights but doing so just sends me back to the bloke i bought it from and not the original dealer who sold and did the 1st service which woul'dnt be fair as bike has been perfect until this happened out the blue without any warning. It's the very reason i did'nt particulary want a bike with a warranty but murphy lives in my house. 

 

Interesting to note a bloke in Italy with this bike had his sorted under warranty on a 2 year older bike  :dunno:

 

Gonna collect on Saturday.